“Vegetarianism is more ethical than eating meat.”Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.Write between 200 and 300 words.

In the last years, choosing to eat vegetarian has become more popular. While some people think that it is more ethical, others believe that it is in human nature to eat meat. This essay will discuss the reasons why being vegetarian is more ethical.

To begin with, vegetarians are increasing in number, which is something that we should be aware of. This popularity is not just a trend, but a change in our beliefs. Modern researchers have discovered that eating meat produces acidity in our bodies, making them more vulnerable to diseases. Consequently, they recommend to reduce our meat consumption.

On the other hand, some vegetarians would discuss that it is not right to kill an innocent animal. Humans are animals as well, but we have something that defines us as a superior specie, that is our ability to think logically. Despite being animals, we can think about our actions, their consequences and their impact on the environment. The role that we should play in this world is to protect animals, because they help to maintain our natural resources and a balance in the ecosystem. This is the ethical attitude.

To sum up, there are different opinions about becoming a vegetarian due to several factors. Some strongly believe that it is ethical, while others believe that it is a natural behaviour. In my opinion, we should all became vegetarian, not only because it is the healthiest option, but because it is an ethical way to take action against the destruction of the earth, and help to keep the ecosystem balanced.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommend reducing'.
Suggestion: recommend reducing
...erable to diseases. Consequently, they recommend to reduce our meat consumption. On the other ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 519, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cosystem. This is the ethical attitude. To sum up, there are different opinions ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, well, while, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 20.9802955665 186% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92692307692 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69958083531 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553846153846 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.067698646 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135246470353 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532005037523 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446080323952 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904596692556 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523951250916 0.0609392437508 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 12.6369458128 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.