Recycling our waste is a big issue today. A lot of people feel that others are not recycling enough and that the government should make it a legal requirement. In your opinion, should laws be needed to ensure that people recycle their waste?
Recently the phenomenon of waste management and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contended by many complex ways of waste segregation and its disposal is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that recycling waste is important and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, modern life can offer society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues and final outcomes are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated rules apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, disposing of waste by recycling might increase the consequences of critical needs.
As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues.
Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of recycling waste far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique process prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 31.9359605911 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 1207.87684729 73% => OK
No of words: 157.0 242.827586207 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58598726115 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.92707691288 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1105504918 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 139.433497537 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.732484076433 0.580463131201 126% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 379.143842365 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6551724138 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0749474074 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.285714286 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 7.25397266985 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130879314654 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569461356048 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482973812173 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0801823129123 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494127796704 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.26 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.