Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it?
Recently the phenomenon of first and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate.
Although contested by many that the matter of complex ways is highly beneficial, such issues are regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that second can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, modern life can offer society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues and final outcomes are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated rules apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, third might increase the consequences of critical needs.
As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To recapitulate, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of fourth far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages prove the significance of the total outcomes, but also pinpoint the issues' potential implications. Modern methods utilized to practice waste management will yield better results.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, first, hence, if, second, so, third, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69565217391 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17588979539 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.7 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2927321216 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.166666667 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.12807881773 145% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0824711494574 0.242375264174 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0236960235606 0.0925447433944 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296855437914 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0318135186635 0.151781067708 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250669433776 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.1 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 79.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 71.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.