Recently the phenomenon of school ought to prepare a student for college, not for work and its corresponding impact sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of school should prepare a student for work in an organization, such issues are regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that school should provide more educate toward university that student can prepare for it. I will explain this throughout this essay.
On the one hand, form the general standpoint, considering a school that makes ready their students for university can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own example, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that school who prepare their students for the university are more focus toward their study. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both focus more on the study and building a core in one field apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, within the realm of science, getting a knowledge regarding work at school level it does make sense because, after school, every student will put forward their step into the university for undergraduate except few students who would like to do a job as well as study at a one time. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of working while studying will lead to stress and not able to focus on both sides. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To sum up, it can be seen that while there are several compiling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of preparing students for a university by providing proper information far outweigh its drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, regarding, so, thus, well, while, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 319.0 242.827586207 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12852664577 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89002372042 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564263322884 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.1761097282 50.4703680194 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.727272727 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.9669160288 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229485048993 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935936971033 0.0925447433944 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566332678382 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142564713485 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615904263142 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.1260098522 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.