Self-driving vehicles pros and cons? to what extend do you agree or disagree?
In recent years there has been colossal upsurge in the ongoing trend that drive-less vehicles are always tremendous ways of benefits, be it an impoverished or affluent nation. Some people believe that self-driving is a big aid to human life. While others disagree. In this essay, I will elaborate both the escalating and plummeting facets of autonomous driving.
At the outset, there are myriad benefits, firstly, in today’s world the advance technology of drive-less vehicles made easier means of travel, highly sophisticated technology covers longer distance in the shortest time, programmable software a great aid to human life. For example, in most of the countries, human driving, heavy traffic over in cities, stressed up situations, anxiety, or drunk lead to crashes, accidents and thus increase in fatality rates. Clearly, thanks to the technology which served a lot and the safest means of travel.
However, there are some pitfalls that can overwhelmed on potential benefits of drive-less technology. The primary concern stems from the fact that self-driving is a failure in human life, the software & hacking that can lead to treats; crashes or road accidents and so on. For instance, a survey conducted by driving school in Perth contemplated that 35% of people failed when tested to participate in human drive resulted lack in driving skills in case of emergency, it also noted there are many chances of hacking software, during drive can divert in criminal activities. Apparently, drive-less technology made tougher human life by increasing fatality rates, violence; culprits and made them dependent utterly on autonomous technology.
To recapitulate from the arguments aforementioned, one can conclude that despite the benefits of artificial intelligence are the instrumental indeed, but the upsides of negative impacts on self-driving are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-13 | Ammu helen | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-06 | Thaarika | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | maniram vicky | 55 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | venkatesh1018 | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-29 | rajujon | 79 | view |
- Self-driving vehicles pros and cons? to what extend do you agree or disagree? 88
- Discuss both sides of Space travel vs. Current crucial problems faced by humans. 77
- Self-driving vehicles pros and cons? to what extend do you agree or disagree? 88
- Some people think that younger employees often have more skills, knowledge and motivation than the old employees. To what extent do you agree with it? Use your experience. 77
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the western countries. According to you, what are the reasons/effects and what solutions can be proposed by governments and individuals?” 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...elf-driving is a big aid to human life. While others disagree. In this essay, I will ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 740, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndent utterly on autonomous technology. To recapitulate from the arguments afore...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51890034364 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00475010194 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618556701031 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.7057729499 50.4703680194 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.833333333 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134003781617 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478778019124 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391690365221 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816772407398 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305902966499 0.0609392437508 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.