Do working from home or office improves the productivity or loss? to what extend do you agree or disagree ?
In recent years there has been paramount upsurge in the ongoing trend that working from office or home enhance or decline the productivity, be it an impoverished or affluent nation. Some people believe that working from office ascend the productivity, while others disagree. In this essay, I will elaborate both merits and demerits of working vicinity.
At the outset, there are myriad benefits, firstly, working from office keep always active towards the work environment from work pressure; client meetings on project schedule discussion that cope up to manage work. For example, in multinational companies, 70% of the people prefer to work in offices, it have been highlighted that personal attention, working in offices, group discussion, client meeting will be a major key factor and are some preponderant facets. As a result, working in offices head towards the boss pressure keep the workers active all the time.
However, there are some pitfalls that can overwhelmed on potential benefits of working in office. The primary concern stems from the fact that, work and pressure extremely to accentuate on one project becomes a hurdle job through working in office area. For instance, in some of the companies it becomes hindrance to focus on one project constantly, it is because of lot of distraction of the other staff which really commence to plaguing to concentrate on the work and thus, results to keep the task incomplete. Clearly, to some extent having distraction of working in office vicinity to some extent is a negative impact.
To recapitulate from the arguments aforementioned, one can conclude that despite of having outstanding facets of working in office environment, but the upsides of negative impacts on working local area shall need to catalyze which are too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rits and demerits of working vicinity. At the outset, there are myriad benefits...
^^^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...he people prefer to work in offices, it have been highlighted that personal attentio...
^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...orking in office area. For instance, in some of the companies it becomes hindrance to focus...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, really, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 31.9359605911 160% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25517241379 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81890171814 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558620689655 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.4561752794 50.4703680194 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.545454545 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196490003073 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879177603594 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447404483399 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132252286839 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264845129422 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.