Some people think that younger employees often have more skills, knowledge and motivation than the old employees. To what extent do you agree with it? Use your experience.
One of the most conspicuous trend of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that younger employees have more knowledge, skills and motivation than old employees. There is a widespread worry that it will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one's life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that young educated employees are active and can only contribute to talents, skills and energetic but also lead to numerous of benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. For example, in our country, multinational companies recruit the young employees as they increase the production and boost-up the business of the companies. Needless to say that, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting the chances of excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned arguments is that it is only likely to help one in thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such a system attributes to responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of young employees.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the potential benefits of having more skills, knowledge and motivation are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ll only lead to a myriad of concerns in ones life. However, I do not entirely accept...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98540145985 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84583553689 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565693430657 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7950019039 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.833333333 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137662440405 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047367655481 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744715728383 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964788887284 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697950153548 0.0609392437508 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.