Recently, the phenomenon of young employees and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of active workers is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that experienced young employees can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the skillful employees can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of skills, motivation, as well as talent, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered productivity. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both professional workers and old workers apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the difficulties of old employees might increase the consequences of less productivity. Moreover, fundamental aspects of practical workers could relate to this reality that the demerits of hardworking employees pertain to talents. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of issues of old workers is correlated negatively with practical works. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of skilled people.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of skilled, motivated employers far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of issues on employers prove the significance of profit to the company, but also pinpoint professional implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69019607843 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28903435987 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635294117647 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.103685062 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.916666667 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119471892615 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376036037543 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282259679457 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0637576100404 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284058700274 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.