Recently, the phenomenon of university life and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of university growth is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that academic records can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, university scholarship can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of records, as well as educational achievements, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered job vacancies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both university talents and results apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the educational system might increase the consequences of educational qualifications. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of job vacancies could relate to this reality that the demerits of university growth pertain to certification. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of educational developments is correlated negatively with the position of the market. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of university skills and developments.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of job criteria far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of qualifications prove the significance of educational policies, but also pinpoint posting job market implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81027667984 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45313418048 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.54808125 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246319156277 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082738022927 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039833344397 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134406272325 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439227593078 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.