In recent years there has been colossal upsurge in the ongoing trend that drive-less vehicles are always tremendous ways of benefits, be it an impoverished or affluent nation. Some people believe that, self-driving an artificial intelligence played a pivotal, imperative and spectacular aid in life of human being. While others disagree. In this essay, I will elaborate both the escalating and plummeting facets of autonomous driving.
At the outset, there are myriad benefits, firstly, in today’s world the advance technology of drive-less vehicles made easier means of travel, highly sophisticated technology covers longer distance in the shortest time, programmable software a great aid to human life. For example, in most of the countries, human driving, heavy traffic over in cities, stressed up situations, anxiety, or drunk lead to crashes, accidents and thus increase in fatality rates. Clearly, thanks to the technology which served a lot and the safest means of travel.
However, there are some pitfalls that can overwhelmed on potential benefits of drive-less technology. The primary concern stems from the fact that self-driving is a failure in human life, the software & hacking that can lead to treats; crashes or road accidents and so on. For instance, a survey conducted by driving school in Perth contemplated that 35% of people failed when tested to participate in human drive resulted lack in driving skills in case of emergency, it also noted there are many chances of hacking software, during drive can divert in criminal activities. Apparently, drive-less technology made tougher human life by increasing fatality rates, violence; culprits and made them dependent utterly on autonomous technology.
To recapitulate from the arguments aforementioned, one can conclude that despite the benefits of artificial intelligence are the instrumental indeed, but the upsides of negative impacts on self-driving are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...spectacular aid in life of human being. While others disagree. In this essay, I will ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 740, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndent utterly on autonomous technology. To recapitulate from the arguments afore...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58862876254 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03800190184 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61872909699 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.3029304461 50.4703680194 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.25 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131624847424 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451213255576 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354760872043 0.071462118173 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789416908508 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289408484272 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.