Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? Pros & Cons.
In recent years, there has been immense upsurge in the ongoing trend on using modernized way of technology; user friendly in using such digital techniques providing all sources by library. In this essay, I will elaborate both merits and demerits of using hand-held digitized technology.
At the outset, there is multitude of benefit, firstly, in today’s advance technology has made it all possible acquiring ample of opportunities in less time easy to sort resources to any topics this technology made it easier. For example, in china, there are thousands of people seen in for their research and development program, looking after many topics, they find the easiest way to cover up all the data in couple of minutes. Clearly, this digitized system made it simple to embrace all the stuff and serves a prestige time; also enhance the speed up of the nation in fast growing technology.
However, there are some pitfalls that can overwhelmed on the benefits of escalating in the fastest technology, plummeting the manual work of the people in myriads. For instance, in China, due to digitized gadgets in all the libraries, the impact resulted in detrimental effects such as, failure of communication system found in numerous loss in the market, drastic effect in loss of market production rates and lead to drought in the business, shattering of the economic system. Apparently, it is also needed to think as an optional replacement of digitized system by means of manual source.
To sum-up, from the argument aforementioned, one can reach out to a conclusion that in addition with benefits of digitized system in the country, but the upsides shall look into this matter for a substitute manual system library which are too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, however, look, so, for example, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 31.9359605911 182% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1149825784 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82456999921 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602787456446 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.5024630542 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.8435914954 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.111111111 104.977214359 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8888888889 20.9669160288 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 7.25397266985 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118758427209 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487603771452 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416022637537 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073842747135 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482225783291 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.3980295567 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.