Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?

Essay topics:

Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?

Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the fact that government should build more roads to welcome more vehicles on roads. Critics, however, claim that government should focus on improving public transport rather to build more roads. In my opinion, later argument is more realistic and worth to believe. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the important features of this essay before deducing a final conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments discussing the fact that there is dire need of government effort to improve public transportation. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that in this contemporary world, where the main congestion is one of the important reason to develop great issues and this issue would be addressed by government to improve the train stations with reasonable fairs as public transport. As a prime example, in developed countries, train stations are the most widely used means of transport and this trend has great contribution to overcome traffic issues on roads.
Another, pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that public transport has it’s specific stations or stops that follow exact timings and provoke travelers to be punctual with healthy life style. Moreover, although personal cars allows the owner to enjoy the freedom of traveling but it contributes increase risks of health issues due to

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 373, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lieve. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the important features of this essay before...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...crease risks of health issues due to
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1195.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28761061947 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70497333199 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601769911504 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.7193022542 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.777777778 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340910641096 0.242375264174 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13950628105 0.0925447433944 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138884667144 0.071462118173 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208006141585 0.151781067708 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147948421214 0.0609392437508 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.