Should library use digital gadget to provide information on different topic?
The importance of library use digital gadget which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend sparked the controversy over the impact in recent years. In my opinion the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will both elaborate positive effects of this trend but thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant from the fact that mobile phone digital gadget to provide information people can gain more information to mobile phone. Another pivotal aspects one of stems of this argument is that mobile phone give information about many topic and many language. Needless to library use digital gadget stand to a good stead.
However there are some pitfalls that negate this argument which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one the most alarming one is that mobile phone provide information different topics but large usage of mobile phone is very harmful body and eyes. Besides, the mobile phone provide only definition of the topic but library books provide meaning of the topic. It can be agreed that upside of instrumental indeed. However it is some has various drawbacks as well. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
According to a arguments aforementioned above, one reach to a conclusion its that benefits of library use digital gadget instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, the potential drawbacks should be not overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun topic seems to be countable; consider using: 'many topics'.
Suggestion: many topics
...hat mobile phone give information about many topic and many language. Needless to library ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun language seems to be countable; consider using: 'many languages'.
Suggestion: many languages
...e give information about many topic and many language. Needless to library use digital gadget...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...digital gadget stand to a good stead. However there are some pitfalls that negate thi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...eed that upside of instrumental indeed. However it is some has various drawbacks as wel...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... are against this trend. According to a arguments aforementioned above, one rea...
^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a argument' or simply 'arguments'?
Suggestion: a argument; arguments
... are against this trend. According to a arguments aforementioned above, one reach to a co...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...tioned above, one reach to a conclusion its that benefits of library use digital g...
^^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ned above, one reach to a conclusion its that benefits of library use digital gad...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67055899254 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53667953668 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9434281357 50.4703680194 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7857142857 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32671752215 0.242375264174 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101554229278 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106712705704 0.071462118173 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197376669281 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725057095647 0.0609392437508 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.