Should people who text-message while they drive be severely penalized?
It is irrefutable to say that in this tech-savvy period people are mostly on their smart phones or any other gadgets. While some do not support the notion of punishing driving individuals who text and drive i am a supporter of it. This essay will highlight some consequences resulted because of texting and driving simultaneously and derive to a conclusion supporting the some punishment.
To begin with, trend of messaging while driving is causing serious accidents at places which is at times leading to death of people because of the reason driving needs concentrations on roads rather than on other thing. To exemplify this, according to Road Safety Department in USA the number of road rages has raised owing to the cell phones with enabled messaging facilities. The repercussion of it is having a strict law that would compel its citizen to use less messaging while driving should be encouraged.
Moreover, raising awareness among the driver about the need of road safety needs to be implemented as the major causes of accidents in roads are reckless drivers. Mobile phones, being the major cause of accidents, penalizing drivers can minimize the accidents; however, there are other causes of accidents like drunk driving, underage drivers, not following the traffic rules which needs to be taken in consideration too.
To recapitulate, penalizing is considered as effective way to discourage drivers from using text messages which will ultimately reduce road rages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... driving individuals who text and drive i am a supporter of it. This essay will h...
^
Line 1, column 373, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...d derive to a conclusion supporting the some punishment. To begin with, trend of me...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2447257384 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86421135235 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628691983122 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.8899889854 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.111111111 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291211777279 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112810819315 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733778266253 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153173500057 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584010859982 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.