Should people who text-message while they drive be severely penalized?
It is irrefutable to say in this tech-savvy period people are on thier smart phones or any other gadgets. While some do not support the notion of punishing driving individuals who text and drive i am a supporter of it. This essay will highlight some of the effects of texing while driving and derive to a conclusion supporting the some punishment.
To begion with, people now days prefer texting rather than calling as one get enough time to reply to a message. This trend of messaging while driving is causing serious accidents at places which is at times leading to death of individuals because of the reason roads are places that needs colossal concentration. To exemplify this, according to Road Saftey Department in USA the number of road rages has risen owing to the cell phones with enabled messaging facilities. The reprecussion of it is having a strict law that would compell its citizen to use less messaging while driving should be encouraged.
Moreover, raising awareness among the driver about the need of road saftey needs to be implemented as the major cause of accidents in roads are careless drivers. Mobile phones, being the major cause of accidents , penalizing drivers can minimize the accidents. Other measures like drunken drivers, escaleted speed are other cause of the mishappen in the roads.
To recapitulate, penalizing is a way but only strict law and needs to be focused.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... driving individuals who text and drive i am a supporter of it. This essay will h...
^
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...porter of it. This essay will highlight some of the effects of texing while driving and der...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...d derive to a conclusion supporting the some punishment. To begion with, people n...
^^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ones, being the major cause of accidents , penalizing drivers can minimize the acc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9914893617 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.730454686 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0839153449 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.636363636 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 7.25397266985 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280829327732 0.242375264174 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951371322971 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708576294348 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144351271842 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603573588395 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.