Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of poorer nations to look after their citizen themselves?
It is irrefutable to say that there is the vast difference of wealth between richer nations and poorer nations. Many opine that richer nations should help themselves, however I am a believer of helping underdeveloped countries and making them sustainable. In this essay I will be discussing both the views before deducing a reasonable conclusion.
To begin with, deteriorating economic and financial condition of third world countries have compelled developed countries to help them financially. Every year billions of dollars is spent on aids in underdeveloped countries, and there are hundreds of organizations taking care of. These aids mostly focus on education and food as the majority of people are under poverty line in these nations.
On the contrary people on the other side of the fence assert that, due to the tendency of giving donations now and then the poorer countries depend on the donations and feel that it’s their right. Helping third world nations is a positive aspect however; the full dependence is not acceptable. Helping should be done in a way, that the nations become self sustained and move their economy from their domestic income. For example, in Nepal with the youngster migrating for work the nation is dependent on either remittance or the aid.
To recapitulate, financial aid helps underdeveloped nation flourish by utilizing in colossal areas like education, health, food and others. As the condition of the underdeveloped nation is week, donor nations should take full responsibility of whether their aid has reached to the desired household .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 299, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...aid has reached to the desired household .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, third, for example, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30158730159 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98170459045 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603174603175 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1236587674 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279462673125 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997669377025 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824478093682 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165490125469 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840114347863 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.