Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
Distribution of wealth among all the nations are not equal, so it may be possible to support the weak nations by developed ones to provide them help like eating stuff, education and so on. However, I think it is the responsibility of authorities belong to that country that they should received education and food free of cost.
Enjoying good infrastructure and amenities is a right of all tax payers, because an assesses complete his obligation towards the government by paying tax from his hard-earned income at regular interval. By collecting tax government is liable for the life of their residents. For example, in a survey report Indian authority collect near about 1.5 crore amount of tax every year from which they are bound to provide food items and education at very cheap rates. Therefore, no other nations bound to pay someone others to their livelihood.
Start new opportunity of nation’s income like export so that they can earn from other developed economy instead of accepting mercy. It will not feel embarrass or helpful to maintain dignity in front of neighbour countries. To illustrate now China are increasing its export sources in the sector of electronics, so citizens of china are not dependent on someone’s mercy. Hence, earning in the place of begging is much better.
Conclusively, it is possible that developed nations can support some other weaker countries but, it is not their obligation so a government of that nation only bound to provide them all facilities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15384615385 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90039084307 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599190283401 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2843465347 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.727272727 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240695627255 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847069206092 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753426281368 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156705836655 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783359777347 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.