Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
Distribution of wealth among all the nations are not equal, so it may be possible to support the weak nations by developed ones to provide them help like eating stuff, education and so on. However, I think it is the responsibility of authorities belong to that country that people of that economy should receive education and food free of cost.
Enjoying good infrastructure and amenities is a right of all tax payers, because an assesses complete his obligation towards the government by paying tax from his hard-earned income at regular interval. By collecting tax government is liable for the life of their residents. For example, in a survey report Indian authority collect near about 1.5 crore amount of tax every year from which they are bound to provide food items and education to them at very cheap rates. Therefore, no other nations are liable to pay someone others to their livelihood.
Start new opportunity of nation’s income like export so that they can earn from other developed economy instead of accepting mercy. It will not feel embarrass or helpful to maintain dignity in front of neighboring countries. To illustrate now China are increasing its export sources in the sector of electronics, so citizens of china are not dependent on someone’s mercy. Hence, earning in the place of begging is much better.
Conclusively, it is possible that developed nations can support some other weaker countries but, it is not their obligation so a government of that nation only bound to provide them all facilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y bound to provide them all facilities.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13438735178 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89631905945 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588932806324 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.633929917 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.090909091 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23993395926 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842017613776 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752774691284 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155701973261 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774401063298 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.