In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? If voting is compulsory in a democratic society, what are some conclusions we can draw about the nature of democracy?
Recently, the phenomenon of compulsory voting in a democratic society and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of mandatory voting system is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that democratic elections can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, a presidential election can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that a public view, as well as the great leader, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered polling stations. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both a democratic right and the electioneering apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the role of polling booth might increase the consequences of electing the bad political party. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the faulty system relate to this reality that the demerits of ballot box pertain to killing peoples during the time of the election. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of choosing the wrong leader is correlated negatively with the economic reduction. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the people’s perception.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of compulsory voting in the democratic country far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of voting machine prove the significance of democratic nature, but also pinpoint social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55474452555 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22654158841 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63503649635 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4894500679 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.833333333 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221464516466 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067577348807 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584812479409 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122801195855 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653564206828 0.0609392437508 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.