In some countries, the no of shooting increases because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
The implication of shootings increases because many people have gun at home, which is fairly debatable has now further attention from numerous arenas. The sizeable influence for this subject has generation controversy over the potential impact of this trend. I believe that this is good and this will be further discussed before reaching logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are diverse reasons, why this subject is considered as vital, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that some people increases the guns at home is good and this can be contributing factor to this is very bad for instance, a research invariably show that this is good. Therefore, the negative impact of that this is denied.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and trend to believe that shooting increases because many people have gun at home is not good, can be addressed with some position facets as well as there are innumerable facts in favor of that this is not good idea, but the most pre-dominant one stems from fact that very bad effective from the children. As an illustration, finding some studies reveal that I am disagree for this easy. Hence, importance of this is undeniable.
The implication of shootings increases because many people have gun at home can be debated. But the fact remain that there were several factors lead to this theme and matter. Eventually, according to the above analysis, it can be concluded that this is not good.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'gunned'.
Suggestion: gunned
...ings increases because many people have gun at home, which is fairly debatable has ...
^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'gunned'.
Suggestion: gunned
...ting increases because many people have gun at home is not good, can be addressed w...
^^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
..., finding some studies reveal that I am disagree for this easy. Hence, importance of thi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 65, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'gunned'.
Suggestion: gunned
...ings increases because many people have gun at home can be debated. But the fact re...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98367346939 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67791809331 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510204081633 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 383.4 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 96.5898716522 50.4703680194 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234788347398 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105526134381 0.0925447433944 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147788648307 0.071462118173 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179799699655 0.151781067708 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409795236021 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.