One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is the colossal upsurge in the increasing number of shootings because many people have guns at home. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in the society. In my opinion, I agree with the statement of people having guns at home increase the number of shootings in the society.
On the one hand, critics may point out that one of the most significant benefit of having guns at home makes us feel safe and fearless. For example, villagers unlike in the past, now feel safe from robbers at remote villages, as they no more need to be awake at nights to safeguard their property, thanks to gun.
On the other hand, there are several arguments in favour of my stance. One of the most preponderant ones is that keeping guns at home has negative consequences for increasing crimes in various ways. Firstly, people misuse the guns to kill for even small conflict because of easy access at their home, such as a school child in America recently used his father's gun to shoot his classmates. According to "Times Magazine December 2017 edition", the proportion of shooting assassination has increased from 10 percent to 30 percent today. Secondly, a large portion of illicit activities has increased because of people having easy access to the gun.
Lastly, in my opinion, the government of USA is taking great initiatives to educate its nationals against negative impact of keeping guns at home. Citizens are being encouraged not to keep guns at home, to avoid any upcoming accidents.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some benefits, the drawbacks of keeping guns at home in the society are indeed too dire to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 8.36945812808 12% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 31.9359605911 194% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86046511628 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65191206658 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56146179402 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.400163808 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.538461538 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301909330742 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120883056208 0.0925447433944 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974248991138 0.071462118173 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175205130493 0.151781067708 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877703996679 0.0609392437508 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.