Some environmentalists claim that people who drive cars do not have a right to complain about pollution since cars also pollute. What is your opinion?
Many nature lovers claim that, people who own cars are responsible for polluting the nature. But it is not a right thing to blame on those who drive cars for the only reason behind it. I strongly disagree with this claim that, there are various other reasons that affect the environment apart from driving a car. In this essay, some of the reasons and the solutions for car users to avoid pollution are discussed in more detail.
To start with, there are a lot of factors like deforrestation, carbon emission, and industrialization that affects the nature apart from driving a car. Further,more usage of over packaged products with plastic and other non-environmental friendly activities also cause serious threat of pollution to the bio diversified place.
Not only the above factors cause disruption, but also the usage of vehicles like cars cause problems due to fuel combustion from these vehicles. But these became an indispensible part for our everyday's activity. But the pollution factors can be reduced by the usage of bio and lead free fuels or battery cars which meets the purpose of an individual without causing any threats to the eco system.
In conclusion, by considering all the above reasons, I strongly disagree that driving the car alone is not the reason for increased pollution levels. There are a lot of solutions availabe to make proper use of the fuels while driving a car to make a pollution free riding. Hence, it is all upto the primary level individual''s responsibility to make use these solutions in preventing the mother earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 329, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...part from driving a car. In this essay, some of the reasons and the solutions for car users...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , more
...nature apart from driving a car. Further,more usage of over packaged products with pl...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...Hence, it is all upto the primary level individuals responsibility to make use these soluti...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, while, apart from, in conclusion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99616858238 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84621984327 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547892720307 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.931034482759 537% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1598611108 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251322814544 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10084928452 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637686277514 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147090501111 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774635401571 0.0609392437508 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.