Some people believe that to be a successful sportsperson, one needs to have a natural ability. Others think that hard work and practice are more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
What makes an athletics successful? is a question that divides people in two groups. One group believes it is mostly their natural ability while other put more weight on being diligent in exercises. In this essay both views will be discussed and based on both views the author will mention his own views at the end of this essay.
There is no doubt that inheriting some specific genes makes one more talented at learning techniques and tactics related to an especial field and therefore, they are a head and shoulder above others in their fields. However, the talent has to be addressed to the right direction to be able to show its value. Those sportsperson such as Messi who are in the right field as they supposed to be based on their potential shown great achievements in their sports life.
On the other hand, innate potential is not the predominant factor for some. They believe hard work and practice open the close doors for everybody. There are many who has no obvious talent in their realm but due to their diligence and hard work have reached the highest level of in their sport branch. For example, Hadi Tabatabaei an Iranian goalkeeper is not as tall as other goalkeepers which means he does not seems to be successful based on natural ability but due to his persistent and diligent exercise, he managed to be the first goalkeeper in Iranian the national team.
in summary, among different parameters which lead to the success of a sports person some have strong hold on natural ability while others put hard work and practice ahead of natural ability. I believe based on the mentioned views, there is no doubt a person with talent and diligence and exercise will always be ahead of others but it does not mean that talent is the predominant factor. It is just a catalyser which makes the process faster and easier for those who have it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Is
What makes an athletics successful? is a question that divides people in two g...
^^
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reat achievements in their sports life. On the other hand, innate potential is n...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 414, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seem'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: seem
...her goalkeepers which means he does not seems to be successful based on natural abili...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 414, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'seem'
Suggestion: seem
...her goalkeepers which means he does not seems to be successful based on natural abili...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...eper in Iranian the national team. in summary, among different parameters whi...
^^
Line 13, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...rameters which lead to the success of a sports person some have strong hold on natural...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in summary, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 326.0 242.827586207 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72392638037 5.00649968141 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42318862771 2.71678728327 89% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509202453988 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 483.3 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1533426463 50.4703680194 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303221032631 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979101776188 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622954895752 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184360498126 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540903016704 0.0609392437508 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.5310837438 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.