Some people believe that developed countries should spend more money on space research, it should spend to the millions of people on Earth who are suffering from hunger. agree or disagree?
In this advanced technological era developing countries are interested to research other than earth. Some people believe that developed countries should spend more money on space research while others disagree it should spend to the millions of people on Earth who are suffering from hunger. I strongly believe that developed nation should spend money ion the people to development.
Firstly, there are millions of people who are suffering with health problem in the world and waiting for the help. Developing countries should provide the basic needs to the people around them with basic health conditions by medical camps and should provide awareness on healthy habits especially in remote areas all around the world. According to the report by university of Sydney on human health, more than 100,000 people are deed in 2016 due to unable to basic medication.
Secondly, there are millions of children’s who are needed the primary education which is very useful to the world development. There are children in all parts of the world without primary education. Developed countries should spent money on this type of people who are suffering with huger and sanitation needs. According the research conducted by world health organization reported that, more that 30% of world population are suffering with hunger and basic needs.
In conclusion, spending millions of money on the public hunger is very helpful to the world development and environmental benefits when compared with space research.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...tries should provide the basic needs to the people around them with basic health conditions by medical...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41101694915 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70059562839 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 139.433497537 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491525423729 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 383.4 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2900257861 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.090909091 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.553700291459 0.242375264174 228% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.225898057424 0.0925447433944 244% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.238055199368 0.071462118173 333% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.352189288031 0.151781067708 232% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.237860545094 0.0609392437508 390% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 55.0591133005 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.