Some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV. Do you agree or disagree?
The importance of developing imagination and language skills by reading books, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of TV in hindering in development of necessary skills has sparked over the potential impact of this trend on our lives in recent years. It can be agreed that people reading books develop more skills than those who watch TV, but there are some drawbacks as well. This essay will discuss both positive and negative impacts and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons to explain how more skills are developed by reading books, but the most conspicuous one is rooted in the fact that people will develop patients in long and lengthy written material that can certainly develop skills such as attention, creativity in the people. For an illustration, research in this area invariably reveals student who aris studying law are more smart and creative because they have to read long lengthy acts and laws books. Thus, it is apparent that reading book develops more skills such as healthy and active mind.
Nevertheless, opponents of this trend tend to believe that TV develops more skills than reading books by giving people peaceful mind and entertainment and it also helps to reduce the stress in the people. For example, new research from Harvard University reveals, students who prefer to watch TV are more relaxed and peaceful. Books are boring and less informatics than TV programs. Therefore, it is obviously true that watching TV also develop various useful skills.
In view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that reading books will develop more useful and better skills than watching TV, although there are few drawbacks that need to be well handled.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13402061856 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58364858648 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567010309278 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0730377512 50.4703680194 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.475359675059 0.242375264174 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18233796277 0.0925447433944 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146817530014 0.071462118173 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292604166368 0.151781067708 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739569776369 0.0609392437508 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.