Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recently, free charge public transport has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “Should be it considered free by the government”?. Whereas it is a widely held view that free public transportation is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the socio-economic standpoint, free charging public transport systems are bound up inextricably with the governmental policy, which indicates they lead to both city improvement and comfortable transport system. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between and roads improvement as well as an exponential increase in encouraging individuals to use public vehicles. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of peoples’ health is correlated positively with not only private cars but also the societal discipline.
Within the realm of the environment, without the slightest doubt, environmental issues attribute to public transport network system, in that it would come down to greenhouse gases, traffic congestion, and air pollution. A salient example of such attribution is carbon dioxide emission, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take environmentally-friendly for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint overcrowding roads problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of improving free charge public transport system.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that providing the free charge public transportation systems by the government could be beneficial for people. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88771929825 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.54052996261 2.71678728327 130% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.7631286497 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.545454545 104.977214359 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182713941113 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681447230221 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062813147831 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11517819022 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696561505881 0.0609392437508 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 12.6369458128 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.