Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of public transportation and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of eco-friendly cars is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that full-charged public vehicles can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, free transportation system can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of efficient trains, as well as subway stations, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the effects of financial affairs on public transport. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both personal bikes and solo-driver cars apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, expensive private taxis might increase the consequences of old-fashioned cars. Moreover, fundamental aspects of useless busses would relate to this reality that the demerits of wrecked air planes pertain to modern airports. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the traffic jam is correlated negatively with the shipping system. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of establishing bus lanes.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of modern transportation infrastructure far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of infrastructure extension prove the significance of affordable travelling network, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
- What is the best invention of the last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics, the aeroplane, and explain why? 85
- Some say that music/movie is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion 85
- The environment we live in is in danger due to various global problems. What are the underlying causes? 88
- What're global problems, and how the government should solve them? 55
- Soon retirement of workers can create job opportunities for young people. discuss 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76717557252 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37699130523 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679389312977 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0914183653 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.916666667 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142461405798 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04215198815 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349273823175 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0741503149376 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037973802368 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.25 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.