Some people point out that experiential learning can work well in formal education. However, other think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning is beneficial in high school or college?
Over the last few decades, the question of implementing experiential learning instead of traditional way of teaching has become the subject of considerable controversy. Some people tend to consider the last one as outdated approach, while others believe that formal education is more effective method. This essay will prove that experiential studying is more productive nowadays.
To begin with, in today’s rapidly changing word of technology there is a wide range of learning approaches, which people can impose in their study process. Generally, the most predominant one is frequently experiential. Moreover, with the onset and the extensive use of the Internet the education system in many countries has been forced to becoming adaptive. For instance, the last research conducted by Australian Institute of Formal Education has revealed that students who used to learn experientially showed 35% better common knowledge level.
Moreover, another contributing factor is the constant development in education, and its impact on the traditional form of teaching is definitely detrimental. These days, students are used to thinking out of the box, which may be challenging studying with outdated learning form. For example, high schools and colleges in Sydney has started to reform their traditional education system towards experiential and it is quantum leap towards better student’s performance.
In conclusion, despite widely supported opinion about advantages of traditional learning methods, their detrimental factors should not be neglected. I firmly believe that brand new experiential approach in contemporary education is more beneficial.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p towards better student’s performance. In conclusion, despite widely supported ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8347107438 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12366083594 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648760330579 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6422336598 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312278041346 0.242375264174 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942115642467 0.0925447433944 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048525473541 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174013146732 0.151781067708 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492665546692 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.