Some people say that relationships should be based on honesty and trust. Others believe that it is sometimes necessary to be dishonest in order to maintain harmony. Which approach do you consider to be better in relationships and why?
The type of relationships we have with a partner, friends, parents, children, relatives, office-colleagues and neighbors are all different. Honesty and trust, however, are the key elements for long-term relationships in almost all areas of life. In my opinion, without these qualities, a relationship can only be based on mistrust and suspicion. This essay will discuss the appropriate mental attitude to encourage and sustain the long-lasting relationship.
Development of trust occurs gradually throughout a relationship, yet destruction of trust can be easily possible by dishonest attitude. For example, if a person lies to someone, it is probable that the other person will eventually realize they have been deceived and as a result, they will be less likely to trust that person in the future. On the contrary, relationships in which people are honest with one another are likely to remain strong and healthy.
Being honest, on the other hand, does not mean people should always say what they know, think or feel. It is, for instance, sometimes better to say nothing than to say something that might hurt another person’s feelings. Also, some people believe that in certain social situations it is better to be dishonest in order to avoid embarrassing another person and to maintain harmony. However, although this hides conflict in the short term, this conflict still exists and may be expressed in a destructive way at a later stage. A Recent survey conducted by Oxford University concluded that disloyalty is the key factor accountable to spoil relations.
In conclusion, because harmonious relationships are important, people must find ways to live with others and to deal with the conflicts that are an unavoidable part of life. Deception is only a short-term solution that will eventually destroy any type of relationship. It is predicted that long-standing associations could be established by righteousness and morality in character.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a destructive way" with adverb for "destructive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...flict still exists and may be expressed in a destructive way at a later stage. A Recent survey condu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 654, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... factor accountable to spoil relations. In conclusion, because harmonious relati...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.5418719212 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 307.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39739413681 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16536967736 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602605863192 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5860327407 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.466666667 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36894786097 0.242375264174 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109748959208 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757426879033 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200759851378 0.151781067708 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509396662734 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.