Some people think that advertising on TV is useless and others disagree. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
It is often debated by many that advertisement on TV is useless, while others have a belief that it has many pros. This essay will look at both sides of the notion before reaching a concrete solution.
On the one hand, TV has been most effective media of advertisement in the recent years. Firstly, Television allows message to be conveyed in form of sight, sound and motion making ads most attractive, while other forms of advertisement allow only sight. This attraction force people to buy more and more products. Secondly, television reaches a much larger audience than other media. This helps in reaching the advertisement effectively to public with in a very short time. For example, a sudden rise in sales of local products in Pakistan is always observed after getting advertised on television. As this reasoning shows that it is worth to advertise on TV.
On the other hand, a handsome amount is required to produce ads, where one has to hire script writer, editor and video maker. Similarly, broadcasting of ads for longer time also require money. Similarly, TV advertisement once made can never be changed, and new advertisements has to be produce in case special offers and promotions. This reasoning shows that it is not good to broadcast add on TV.
To conclude with, with advancement in media and technology many ads are produced and advertised on TV. In my opinion, having very few cons like investment of money and on special occasions one can't change the ad, it is worth to get advertisement TV because of a large number of audience, and it has attractive nature as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n before reaching a concrete solution. On the one hand, TV has been most effect...
^^^
Line 3, column 600, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...after getting advertised on television. As this reasoning shows that it is worth t...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s that it is worth to advertise on TV. On the other hand, a handsome amount is ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it is not good to broadcast add on TV. To conclude with, with advancement in me...
^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...t of money and on special occasions one cant change the ad, it is worth to get adver...
^^^^
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...orth to get advertisement TV because of a large number of audience, and it has attractive nature ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, look, second, secondly, similarly, so, well, while, as to, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83266425417 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589090909091 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9330804242 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7333333333 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21671143107 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704388222091 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400534267668 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134203611998 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362914533955 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 12.6369458128 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.5310837438 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.