Some people think that life experience is more important than the formal education provided is schools and universities. How far do you agree with this statement, and provide examples?
The issue raises a debate about whether formal education provided by schools or universities are more important or real-life experience. The point of contention calls for its analysis from various perspectives. However, it is apparent that there are many benefits that are impossible to get without formal education that we can get from school and universities.
From a social standpoint, life experience can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered vocational education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, some people adopt an opposite view and tend to believe that real life experience most important and comes with the growing age and increases. Similarly, it is crucial to note that the education system only based on theory and never able to beat real-life experience. For instance, as per the study of Oxford University, there are many successful people in the world who never went to school but did inventions that changed the whole scientific theory. From this, it becomes quite evident that real-life experience is always more important.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the life experience far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, however, if, similarly, so, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51515151515 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03446447214 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628787878788 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7093501562 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.25397266985 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293294272412 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927359355212 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713845392638 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155617790773 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473240549396 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.