Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.
In today’s world competition and advertisements are very important as well the children's education is more important than anything. Advertising in school is a great resource for public school, despite the children's concentration may divert into unwanted things. I consummately accord with the statement definitely it will impact the school children.
In current situation public schools are running with money shortage to give the salary who working there as a teacher. Even though, the government giving monthly salary as usual. The private organisation and various people are helping to run the public schools efficiently. There is no need to get money from the advertisements. For instance, when I was studying in my school, the same incident happened in my school. The Corporate Company wanted to fix the hoardings in our school ground, also they occupied vast area in our playing area. So, I personally affected in this notion, for that I am not accord with the idea of advertise in school.
In the flip of the coin, from the different sources of money will help to run the school efficiently and boost the school welfare fund growth. Although, the advertisement should carefully need to select, because the advertisement never make student's mind diversion in wrong path. The commercial ads can related with the school students or the things students using for their education. Also the ad can related stationary related or motivating the student.
In conclusion, Instead of placing ads in schools other places need to choose for the commercial things, because school is for the education and offspring’s are developing their knowledge. Today's students are going to rule the future world, therefore we have to take care of their studies well. We should avoid such a things from school.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ngs students using for their education. Also the ad can related stationary related o...
^^^^
Line 7, column 321, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a thing' or simply 'things'?
Suggestion: a thing; things
...heir studies well. We should avoid such a things from school.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24137931034 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.906829058 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579310344828 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4425888726 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4117647059 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.9669160288 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.70588235294 7.25397266985 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321874007252 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10117018142 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858369536636 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202353274014 0.151781067708 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473321662254 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.