Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of universities should provide practical training more than theoretical knowledge and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that providing a practical training can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, having some practical training more than theoretical knowledge in universities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, giving practical training throughout the courses might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of educational backgrounds could relate to this reality that the demerits of educational reforms pertain to an practical education. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of providing more practical training throughout courses far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...erits of educational reforms pertain to an practical education. As a tangible exam...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93238434164 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26829919266 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629893238434 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.265796889 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.916666667 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284803210604 0.242375264174 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093005411243 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733577072403 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164035404552 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291381653112 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.41 11.5310837438 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.