Some say that music is as important as other subjects in school to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning music like other subjects and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated dispute. Although contested by many that the matter of teaching arts and music is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that music institutes can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the importance of having music lessons in school can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of different skills in children, as well as being eager to go to school, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered musical instruments. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both private schools and state schools apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, promoting learning ability in children by teaching music to them might increase the consequences of paying less attention to science courses. Moreover, fundamental aspects of music assignments can relate to this reality that demerits of interest in music pertain to children’s misbehavior. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of learning a music is correlated negatively with parental unawareness. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of concentration on science.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the significance of music abilities in children like other subjects far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of private music teachers prove the significance of curricular activities, but also pinpoint playing the guitar implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60207612457 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23325620919 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629757785467 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8019028515 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.916666667 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249203890066 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079743629499 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476964342421 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136158974915 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178531135468 0.0609392437508 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.