the government should reduce their investment in art, music, and painting. do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of reducing governmental investment in art and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated dispute. Although contested by many that the matter of governmental institutions is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that private institutions can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, paying attention to artistic activities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of abroad investments, as well as private investments, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered government investment. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both art galleries and musical instruments apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, decreasing money spent on art might increase the consequences of concerts. Moreover, fundamental aspects of musical instruments can relate to this reality that demerits of learning art pertain to the public tendency to art. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of public satisfaction is correlated negatively with talent in art. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of fundamental decisions.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of dedicating governmental money to art far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of governmental decisions prove the significance of expensive art, but also pinpoint inexpensive art implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78244274809 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40566896292 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641221374046 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8728914701 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.25 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153709656372 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527677126274 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508503056634 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0833272727057 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182878999858 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.