Some universities deduct marks from students' works if given in late, what are your views and what action will you recommend to take?
Some universities deduct marks from students' works if submitted late has always been a debatable topic. Many people believe that institutions have to implement new methods of submitting the assignments on time instead of cutting the marks. I strongly disagree with the statement that few reminders have to send before deducting marks. This essay would further elaborate the recommended actions that universities have to take with justifying examples and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, the assignments or task is given by the faculty or college sometimes may not be understandable to all the students and they will wait for other students to complete the task, copy the work from fellow classmates. For example, the topic provided on global warming, will not be clear to few children those who are low in their academics. This example clearly exemplifies us that deduction of marks is not the best solution and lectures has to think about low performing students.
Secondly, reducing marks creates an discrimination among students. University professors have to think new ways of submitting given assignment work on time. The best solution for this is lecturers has to sit with them and need to know the problems or concerns that they are facing in submitting task on time. Universities must provide proper guidelines to such students and instill discipline and make them punctual.
To conclude, instead of reducing marks universities has to implement new ways for students who do not submit assignments on time and encourage such students with proper guidelines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: FELLOW_CLASSMATE[1]
Message: Use simply 'classmates'.
Suggestion: classmates
...o complete the task, copy the work from fellow classmates. For example, the topic provided on glo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...ed on global warming, will not be clear to few children those who are low in their...
^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ts. Secondly, reducing marks creates an discrimination among students. Universi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29527559055 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91098272885 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570866141732 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9077660673 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.083333333 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224942807195 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858513017541 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847436666606 0.071462118173 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13658861168 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452282828876 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.