Some universities deduct marks from students' works if given in late, what are your views and what action will you recommend to take?
Nowadays, it is increasingly acknowledged that some universities will deduct marks from students' late works is one of the big issues which the students are facing. While some people believed that deducting marks can improve the bad habits of delaying assignments, others advocate that the universities have other ways to remind the students of submitting assignments on time. As far as I am concerned, the universities can use different alternative methods without deducting marks.
People who emphasized the importance of deducting marks from late assignments are primarily focusing on the significance of punctuality. They advocate that it can help students develop such concepts and always meet deadlines in their future employment.
Nevertheless, this argument does not hold water. It is evidently reasonable for me to believe that developing a helpful habit must rely on the positive approach. The main justification of this view is that people are always more interested in reward when they finish their work before the deadline. That is to say, the universities can provide extra reward such as certificates or prizes for the students who completed their homework in advance.
In a nutshell, while this controversial topic never fails to attract the public attention, we may safely reach the conclusion that using alternative methods has more beneficial in respect of this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...g issues which the students are facing. While some people believed that deducting mar...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, nevertheless, so, while, such as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 216.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47222222222 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04301579528 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615740740741 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5688898905 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.454545455 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211323048032 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780176096502 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906917435792 0.071462118173 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113596432088 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101494645872 0.0609392437508 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.