Some universities deduct marks from students' works if given in late, what are your views and what action will you recommend to take?
The controversial topic with respect to students' mark of their works in university never fails to attract public attention. There has been a heated debate on whether some universities should deduct marks from students works who give in late. From my perspective, I tend to advocate regarding this issue.
It is evidently reasonable for me to believe that universities should deduct marks of those late submissions without a proper reason due to the fact that it is a fair and effective policy to ensure the justice for every student. This is because the deadline is set to give every student the same maximum time to finish their assignments, but those who give works lately will have more time to complete their tasks. Therefore, deducting marks of the late submissions can maintain fairness for those students who hand in assignments on time.
On the basis of the above reason, there are many solutions that can mitigate this problem. Firstly, universities should take action to build up their notification system, such as sending reminders three days before the deadline via school email. In addition, tutors can provide additional help for students who have difficulty finishing their assignments, which means removing obstacles for students to complete their works.
Given all the points discussed above, I can conclude my opinion that universities should deduct marks from late submitting works. Meanwhile, they can remind students in advance of the deadline and provide additional help for students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udents who hand in assignments on time. On the basis of the above reason, there ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, regarding, so, therefore, while, in addition, such as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3153526971 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72991837442 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585062240664 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1665421405 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.454545455 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247390674547 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10413154356 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798474652603 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165230755341 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682507586806 0.0609392437508 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.