Students with degree earn high salary than who doesn’t have an academic qualification. Therefore, some argue that they have to pay the full cost of their courses. Give your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of earning high salary by educated students and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of academic qualifications are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that paying the full cost of academic courses can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, earning high salary by educated persons can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of an academic qualification, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of experienced students. Thus, beneficial ramifications of practical courses are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, earning high incomes by students can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of inefficient academic courses are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described paying the full cost of education. Hence, predicted outcomes of inexperienced employees are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of earning high salary by educated workers far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of academic qualifications prove the significance of costly courses, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71784232365 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24981838516 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609958506224 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6830774613 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.272727273 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291955050088 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950184561238 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468178604768 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16764648266 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401217151585 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.