Successful sports and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not.
It is irrefutable to say that sports stars and movie stars have burgeoned to become a role model. Although it can have profound adverse effects on the young, I am inclined to highly believe that this phenomenon is quite beneficial and should be promoted. This essay will elucidate some pros and cons of following the public stars as a role model.
There are myriads of advantages on this arguments but the preponderant one stems from the fact that following the superstars or athlete could encourage the youth to make an all-out effort to achieve their goals. For example, to measure the impact of the successful leader on peoples` lifestyle, a recent research conducted by Yazd University researchers in 2010 has shown that such parameters such as hardworking, the general public, and devoted admirer shoulb be taken into consideration. Moreover, this condition would lead to sportsmen or sportswomen rank supreme on the eyes of the world, which shaping up the life of youngsters. Therefore, if these heroes brought by individuals, especially the teenagers, as a source of inspiration, they would make them be perfect.
On the other hand, one of the predominant disadvantages of following sports stars or movie stars is that they could have detrimental effect beacuse they tend to are snowed under with attention of all societies and media, which can cause some illegal activities. For instance, to understand the relationship betweeen idolize these stars on social activities, the result of a study undertaken by Tehran University researchers revealed that personal life of these uniques is negatively correlated by advertising illegal goods, which may lead to the young would-be criminal. Hence, it is evident that accepting without limitation
these famous persons could have dramatically negative points.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on imitating of celebrities, my personal sentiment is that positives far outweigh drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
.... There are myriads of advantages on this arguments but the preponderant one stem...
^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...uch parameters such as hardworking, the general public, and devoted admirer shoulb be taken in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 308.0 242.827586207 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41883116883 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99027736645 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616883116883 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.4360076662 50.4703680194 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.727272727 104.977214359 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.9669160288 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 7.25397266985 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13988116062 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054441126999 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736362839444 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0618512776787 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666996273331 0.0609392437508 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 53.1260098522 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.