Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are youngsters role model. Do you support it or not?
In recent years, there has been a drastic rise in the influence of eminent sports and film celebrities on the young generation. While most people believe that this influence has been extremely beneficial for shaping a child's future, others oppose this idea. This essay will discuss both sides and provide reasons why such influences have a positive impact on the child's development.
To begin with, one strong argument for children being adversely impacted by having film stars as their role model is the lavish lifestyle these artists possess. Such an impressive lifestyle influence children to imitate them in their lives. For example, children are more likely to buy items from a brand promoted by their favourite star, which is often expensive. In addition, children often compel their parents to spend enormous amounts on it. Thus, such influences have had a negative effect to an extent.
However, there are several arguments in favour of the advantages of choosing famous sports or entertainment industry stars as role models. Because most sports stars come from a humble background and spend a significant portion of their life working hard to achieve stardom, they can positively shape a child's attitude. Roger Federer, for instance, has influenced several underprivileged children worldwide to dream big and work hard in life. Another advantage is that such eminent personalities have promoted the young generation to take up sports and acting as a professional career, which otherwise is considered a risky career. Therefore, the positive impact far outweighs its drawbacks.
To conclude, despite some negative influences, successful sports and film stars have mentored and influenced a great chunk of the young generation to work hard and making their dreams a reality. In my opinion, children aspiring to become such personalities will promote the sports and entertainment industry.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43434343434 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8126189621 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589225589226 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3073036318 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.6 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170421433506 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571249704792 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682445160398 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108753176453 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464866846019 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.