Positive And Negative Effects Of Technology Information Through Mass Media
In recent years, there has been a tremendous rise in technology-driven mass media penetration globally. While some argue that mass media has negatively impacted people, others argue that it has greatly enhanced human life. This essay will discuss both the side and provide reasons why the positive effects far outweigh those that are negative.
To begin with, one of the main arguments supporting the negative effect is that of fake news. Since electronic devices capable of spreading information is now available with everyone, any miscreant can easily disseminate misleading information to the public domain. For instance, distorted information is being circulated in order to alter the public perception by rival political parties. Availability of free information on the internet has caused several print media businesses to shut down owing to decreasing revenues. Thus, technology innovations have had a deleterious effect to an extent.
However, there are several arguments in favour of the use of technology to spread information in real-time. Whenever an event or important news is published, it reaches people worldwide instantly. Mass media which was earlier limited to print media is now available on several gadgets such as mobile phones, laptops and other connected devices. For instance, a person from a geographically distant country gets updated at the same time as an individual from where the event occurred. As a result, people are more aware of happenings across the world, which enables them to make informed decisions.
To conclude, despite some negative issues concerning fake news being spread, the overall benefits of technology in the mass media business is significant. In my opinion, future technologies will enable humans to be more aware of events globally and will improve one's quality of life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 263, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...are of events globally and will improve ones quality of life.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, while, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4823943662 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91132884568 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640845070423 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3189432814 50.4703680194 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.8 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360732725923 0.242375264174 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101671626101 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613020899827 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204288719709 0.151781067708 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565926504244 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.1260098522 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.