Violence in the media promotes violence in the society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, there has been a tremendous rise in violence globally which are being captured by media outlets. While some people believe that it is the duty of media businesses to cover such violence, others oppose this idea. This essay will discuss both sides and provide reasons why disturbing content published by media have a detrimental impact on society.
To begin with, one strong argument in favour of media industries covering violent crimes including rapes, murder and war-crimes is based on their job to disseminate accurate information without any bias. People feel these leads to a vigilant citizen who is aware of their surroundings and thus, can make informed decisions. For example, although rapes in India are gruesome and often fatal, extensive reporting has caused severe public outrage and legislation for stringent punishment to be passed. As a result, the government and media have used the grave consequences to dissuade people from committing crimes.
However, several arguments support the censoring of media content in the public domain as it negatively impacts society, especially children. Firstly, watching such disturbing content has a deleterious effect on a child's psychological development, and in some cases, influences them to imitate. For instance, movies which glorify an act of killing may influence a child to think that it is morally correct to commit crimes. In addition, several crimes take cues from movies and past-crimes, which beats the very purpose of making movies or reporting the news without prejudice. Therefore, the government mandates media companies to show popups in Internet or televisions requiring viewer discretion.
To conclude, despite violence being portrayed in media extensively, it is vital to censor disturbing content before disseminating them. In my opinion, since violence negatively impacts humans psychic, the government should actively monitor it to curb its harmful impacts.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, in my opinion, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57859531773 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84648984651 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655518394649 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.727597571 50.4703680194 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.142857143 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2857142857 7.25397266985 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133823643127 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466675582358 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462650170139 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906197524782 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523861378258 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.