Do you think consumers should be held responsible for their poor nutritional choices, or do food manufacturers need to be more honest about the potential dangers involved in eating certain foods which are high in salt, sugar and fat?
In recent years, there has been a drastic increase in the manufacture of processed foods that are unhealthy for public consumption, yet remain extremely popular. While some believe that consuming such items regularly are detrimental to the health of an individual, others oppose this idea. This essay will discuss both sides and provide reasons why manufacturers need to be held accountable for its proliferation.
To begin with, one strong argument by owners of businesses that deal with the production of edible items rich in salt and saturated fat is that a detailed nutritional table is already printed on each packaged item. Since they have already provided the figures, they assume that the customer makes a conscious decision while purchasing such items. For example, Lays, a global chips manufacturer claims that their packet cover clearly outlines the quantity of salt and other substances. In addition, businesses feel that since they have adequate approvals from the government agencies for producing these items, they are not breaking any law.
However, there are several arguments in favour of those that claim these businesses are not sufficiently honest while disclosing its harmful effects on prolonged consumption. Research suggests that increased reliance on packaged foods have a negative effect on the overall growth of a child. For instance, children relying on fast-food are more prone to cardiovascular diseases and are more likely to be obese. Moreover, critics point out that the commercials run by these companies are solely to attract more unaware customers, whereas they ignore presenting the truly damaging effects.
To conclude, despite several food manufacturers claiming that they represent the nutritional benefits adequately, they fail to highlight the deleterious impact of certain substances. In my opinion, they should be held accountable and laws need to enacted that mandates them to disclose relevant nutritional details.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87212464911 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643333333333 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8347669833 50.4703680194 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 129.0 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205937250572 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070072083181 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054072829565 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124168981291 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359095240573 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.