Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, there has been a drastic rise in environmental pollution levels. While some argue that each individual can alter their lifestyle to limit pollution, others claim that it is the responsibility of the government to introduce legislation to control this. This essay will discuss the reasons why the government can effectively manage this growing concern.
To begin with, one of the arguments in favour of individuals leading the change is that, ultimately it is their actions that lead to deleterious effects on the environment. Burning of garbage, excessive use of plastics, reliance on chemicals for farming are some of the contributors to pollution. A change in the mindset of individuals is of paramount importance. For example, if people can abolish single-use plastics for paper or jute packets, it will eliminate the use of non-biodegradable plastics. Moreover, utilizing public transport will reduce vehicular pollution.
However, only the government can bring sustainable changes that reduce pollution. They have adequate resources available at their disposal to minimize the sources of pollution. Since industries are the major contributors to pollution, stringent laws that limit the amount of industrial effluents and harmful gases should be brought. For instance, reliance on clean energy to power a city rather than coal-powered power plants will reduce air pollution. Not only can they bring new policies, but also make it mandatory for each individual to adhere to them strictly or risk being penalised.
To conclude, despite measures taken by individuals to control pollution, only the government can bring a significant reduction in their levels due to the sheer magnitude of their influence. In my opinion, they should bring effective regulations and enforce them in order to conserve life on Earth by assuaging environmental concerns.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
..., reliance on chemicals for farming are some of the contributors to pollution. A change in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 5.75862068966 365% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56445993031 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09981966932 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595818815331 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7220341876 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.466666667 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122040068431 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424172505136 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353105413045 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730299600657 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292948520431 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.