Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, there has been a drastic rise in the levels of environmental pollution due to unsustainable exploitation of nature for human benefit. While some argue that individuals can make a difference, others believe that only the government can effectively counter this problem. This essay will discuss both the sides and provide reasons why only the government can alleviate environmental concerns.
To begin with, one strong argument in favour of individuals driving the change is that ultimately, it is up to them to embrace lifestyle changes that lower the factors responsible for pollution. For example, abolishing the use of plastics for paper or cloth-based packaging material can eliminate a major source of soil pollution. Furthermore, preferring public transport over individual cars can lessen air pollution. Therefore, individual contributions can help reduce pollution to an extent.
However, only the government can help eliminate pollution levels on a large scale. Not only are they the most competent authority, but also have adequate financial and material resources at their disposal to implement stringent laws for tackling this issue head-on. For instance, proper regulations can limit the quantity of industrial effluents discarded into rivers and harmful gases released by industries. Moreover, they can make it mandatory for citizens to abide by environment-friendly policies to curtail the extent of pollution.
To conclude, despite the contribution of each individual to manage pollution, a significant reduction in pollution can occur only with the intervention of the government. In my opinion, nature-friendly citizens coupled with a strong government resolve can most certainly mitigate the factors causing environmental pollution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 5.75862068966 417% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83141762452 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28544452263 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632183908046 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6589698418 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.076923077 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.25397266985 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162303031307 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660399168381 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383833835646 0.071462118173 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102144489125 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132191500436 0.0609392437508 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.