In recent years, there has been a dramatic rise in skilled immigration, or brain drain to developed nations for pursuing specialized research, better employment opportunities and enhanced quality of life. This essay will discuss the reasons why developing nations are observing an outflow of its talent-rich professional pool and explore solutions to reduce this deleterious trend.
To begin with, one strong argument in favour of the occurrence of brain drain is the unavailability of world-class infrastructure in emerging countries for satisfying the needs of these professionals. Another reason is the disparity between the remuneration of professionals in developing and developed nations. Skilled professionals do not feel adequately compensated, and therefore try to look for opportunities abroad. Therefore, they migrate to wealthy nations, which leads to a precarious situation for these under-developed countries, as they lose out on necessary talent severely impacting their development and future.
However, several solutions can be implemented to dissuade skilled labour from migrating. Firstly, the government should provide monetary assistance to modernise the infrastructure facilities across the country. Equipping hospitals with modern state-of-the-art devices, for instance, will not only restrain doctors from migrating but will also enhance the medical facilities available to the public. In addition, the government should increase the wages of skilled professions at par with global standards to retain talent. While the government does its part to create a conducive environment for workers, the public should be inspired to serve for the betterment of one's own country above all.
To conclude, despite the rise in brain drain cases, increasing infrastructure facilities and adequate compensation will help reduce this phenomenon substantially. In my opinion, the concerted effort of the government and patriotic public will enable a country to retain its talent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... enable a country to retain its talent.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95818815331 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31399368078 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634146341463 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8099033202 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.538461538 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157267446444 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538718353133 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329641789071 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953068755607 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254018786861 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.