Talk about pros and cons of this era as is full of daily inventions.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people arguing pros and cons of daily inventions. As such, there are both merits and demerits to this trend, although I am of the opinion that former outdo the latter.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that technological advances show people a more efficient way to do things in every sphere. Not only can students learn on a global scale without leaving their classes, but agriculture processes that once required dozens upon dozens of human workers can also be automated now, thanks to advances in technology, which mean cost-effective for peasants. Needless to say, all these benefits stand mankind in good stead, when it comes to improving and advancing their lifestyle.
There are, however, some drawbacks which can easily overwhelm potential impact of this trend. The primary one stems from the fact that people are becoming more dependent on advanced technology. Besides, a breakdown of any machine or a crash of any computer makes humans almost disabled until the problem is resolved. Hence, it is apparent that why many are against of dependence on daily invention.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some drawbacks, the benefits of state-of-the art technology are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08260869565 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75560607477 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665217391304 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0585468517 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.272727273 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 7.25397266985 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0907305294663 0.242375264174 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033609498615 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591179903402 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0600964174173 0.151781067708 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07721791301 0.0609392437508 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.