Talk about an invention that you think beneficial or harmful.
Recently, the phenomenon of "the beneficial or harmful inventions" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that the invention of the worldwide Internet might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the invention of the Internet can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, the advent of the Internet can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that distance learning methods and the roles of computers are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of the Internet on medical education. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both the effects of social media and new learning methods distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of physiology, without the slightest doubt, the effects of the Internet invention might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the lack of physical activities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the Internet and computers can relate to the reality that the demerits of the worldwide web can pertain to decreasing exercises. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of modern technologies were correlated positively with the active society, the local authorities would ultimately address the physical effects of the online games on children. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of Artificial Intelligence.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt vigorously to support the idea that the merits of the invention of the Internet and computers far outweigh its downsides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70344827586 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26046472181 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596551724138 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.0538385726 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.363636364 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0932349555291 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341157211899 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428126103937 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0542273112947 0.151781067708 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044304566593 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.13 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 55.0591133005 207% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.