What do you think of bidding to host sports events? Is it a blessing or a curse? Give your opinions.
Recently, the phenomenon of "bidding to host sports events" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that sport events might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that hosting sport events can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the economics standpoint, bidding to host sports events can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that flourishing the society's income and supportive companies are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the benefits of building stadiums. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both selling tickets and providing entertainments distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of science, without the slightest doubt, bidding to host sports events might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of traumas in sports. Moreover, fundamental aspects of being an athlete can relate to the reality that the demerits of champions can pertain to having a talent. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of sport events were correlated positively with physical activities, the local authorities would ultimately address the lack of the adolescents' exercise. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of the effects of physical activities on adults.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of bidding to host sports events far outweigh its downsides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75185185185 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19808112907 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640740740741 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8922049918 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.181818182 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199693663929 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746059340566 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642944824129 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127709464784 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375612119911 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.08 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.